Transitions
Be Creative!!!
Transitions
Forum
» Projects & Contests / Program Challenges
» Transitions
Summary:
Just a fun challenge to make the coolest, smallest, and fastest transition.
Here's mine, just a short little creation using text.
1→A:1→B:1→C
Repeat A=11
Output(A,1,"ºººººººººººººººººººººººººº //26 degree signs
A+1→A
End
Repeat B=11
Output(B,1,"OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO //26 O's
B+1→B
End
Repeat C=11
Output(C,1,"θθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθθ //26 thetas
C+1→C
End
1→A:1→B:1→C
Repeat B=11
Output(B,1,"OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO //26 O's
B+1→B
End
Repeat A=11
Output(A,1,"ºººººººººººººººººººººººººº //26 degree signs
A+1→A
End
Repeat C=11
Output(C,1," //26 spaces
C+1→C
End
ClrHome
DelVar ADelVar BDelVar C
"Basically, it fills the screen then clears it. The total storage is 333 bytes. If you are on a monochrome calculator, change the 11 in the repeat loops to 9, and only use 16 characters instead of 26 for the outputs.
For this to be smaller by 2/3 and faster, just remove the first "O" output and the θ outputs. The size becomes 240 bytes.
Enjoy!
Also, Merry Christmas everyone!
UBER
🧟Initiating Project Horde 🧟
I could, but I was feeling a bit lazy lol.
🧟Initiating Project Horde 🧟
I've always held that the best way to code is to be as lazy as possible.
The solution to a complex problem is often a simple answer.
And when you have memory leaks due to lazy coding? When you don’t include error prevention? When you don’t make it user friendly just because you know how to use it? That’s really the best way to code?
I think we are interpreting lazy in different ways. You detest laziness that begets poor code design or outcomes, which is of course to be avoided. I promote laziness that begets efficiency and speed, because a lazy coder can't be bothered with a convoluted solution if an easier one exists.
The solution to a complex problem is often a simple answer.
What I meant as lazy was "I just saw this challenge and want to make something" then went with the first solution I thought of. A for( loop would possibly work better, but I didn't think of that before I made it.
🧟Initiating Project Horde 🧟
kg583 The way you define laziness is not laziness but rather extreme efficiency. The reason most of us code is to make computers do things for us, ultimately. That might seem lazy, but it is actually the most efficient way of doing things.
Work smarter, not harder :P
Working smarter, not harder is literally being lazy since you don't want to work harder.
The solution to a complex problem is often a simple answer.
That depends. Is it easier to lift a 100-pound weight once or a 25-pound weight 4 times? Working harder would say the 100 pound one, but working smarter would say the 25 pound one would be easier. It all depends. At the end, the same thing is being accomplished, it just depends on how you go about it.
🧟Initiating Project Horde 🧟
I choose a lazy person to do a hard job. Because a lazy person will find an easy way to do it.
Bill Gates
…indistinctness is my forte…
J.M.W. Turner
I've also heard this attributed to Andrew Carnegie. So I did a little digging. If I see a picture of a famous person with a quote, I assume it's fake until I see otherwise.
4920616D204261746D616E
/forum/t-9486487/transitions#post-