Site Evaluation

Forum Attachments

Site Evaluation

burr 01 Dec 2007 05:54

Just out of curiosity, I was wondering how you guys feel about the progress of the site, and if there is anything that we should change?

Re: Site Evaluation

JoostinOnline 03 Dec 2007 22:49

Anything that I didn't do is a disgrace! ;-)

Re: Site Evaluation

burr 04 Dec 2007 00:56

A disgrace to whom? :D

Re: Site Evaluation

GoVegan 18 May 2008 10:22

I think the site is near perfection. In all honesty, all edits we seem to be doing is simply fine-tuning - nothing major. I'm talking about the 83 portal, by the way. I think that the 68k portal is by far in its infancy. But at least it has a sense of direction, I mean, the 83 portal had nothing to be created from - it is almost something out of nothing.

If the site was to be given a percentage, I would say 97%, an A+. I say this because there is not yet a site logo, 1%, there are a few commands not done for the TI-84plus due to the 2.30 firmware update, 1%, and some pages need fine-tuning and extra clarity, another 1%. This site is so very close to 100%.

By the way, I think JoostinOnline's comment is bias =D

Cheers ~ James Kanjo

Re: Site Evaluation

GoVegan 07 Jun 2008 08:55

Ooh, my evaluation is in for a change due to recent events! We'll start with 100%:

1. MINUS 1% for unfinished commands, including missing screenshots and firmware version 2.30 commands, and the incomplete starter-kit;
2. MINUS 1% for pages which need fine-tuning and extra clarity.

A total of 98%, an A+. We're nearly there, guys!

Cheers ~ James Kanjo