<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Older TI Calculators</title>
		<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Older TI Calculators&quot; - I&#039;m considering buying an older TI calculator such as the TI-81/82/85/66.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 03:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655#post-4885940</guid>
				<title>Re: Older TI Calculators</title>
				<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators#post-4885940</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>J_Walker87</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>6818760</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Thanks.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655#post-4885226</guid>
				<title>Re: Older TI Calculators</title>
				<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators#post-4885226</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 14:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Jeffitus</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>5421889</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'd recommend the TI-86; though I don't own it it is the most powerful of the models you mentioned and also has a very nice library of assembly games and programs.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655#post-4884794</guid>
				<title>Re: Older TI Calculators</title>
				<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators#post-4884794</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 03:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
								<wikidot:authorUserId>3338172</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Honestly, if I were you, I'd buy a TI-84 Plus CE (Or at least a TI-84+SE). The older calculators are okay, but personally, I'd just run those in an emulator.</p> <p>The TI-83+ Might not be able to link with those calculators you suggested (nor the TI-84+CE as well). But you can also run that in an emulator as well&#8230; your choice.</p> <p>I know that's not any of the calc you requested, but this is my recommendation since I haven't used any of those.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655#post-4884537</guid>
				<title>Re: Older TI Calculators</title>
				<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators#post-4884537</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>J_Walker87</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>6818760</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Please Reply, I'm really confused on which would be the best.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655#post-4883479</guid>
				<title>Older TI Calculators</title>
				<link>http://tibasicdev.wikidot.com/forum/t-13989655/older-ti-calculators#post-4883479</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>J_Walker87</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>6818760</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I'm considering buying an older TI calculator such as the TI-81/82/85/86 since they're only like 10$ on ebay right now. The reason I'd buy it would be to program on it. Does anyone have any recommendations? Also: I currently own a TI-83+ and it would be great if I could link it to the calculator I buy.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>