Click here to edit contents of this page.
Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an "edit" link when available.
Append content without editing the whole page source.
Check out how this page has evolved in the past.
If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.
View and manage file attachments for this page.
A few useful tools to manage this Site.
See pages that link to and include this page.
Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.
View wiki source for this page without editing.
View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).
Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.
Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.
General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.
Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc.
Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.
What the community thinks:
Pretty cool, you should try a quintic equation silver ;) I don't have my calc to test, but I think I can optimize!
Nevermind the ö, I was just running into an odd formatting error with the inverse token.
Z80 Assembly>English>TI-BASIC>Python>French>C>0
One thing I've been meaning to do is remove the ClrList L1. I originally stored the roots to a list, but I didn't like the way a list displayed complex roots, so I had it stored to regular variables, but forgot to remove the ClrList. I'll go ahead and do that while I'm thinking about it.
As for a quintic equation solver, I may create one, but I'm pretty sure the PLYSMITH app (I think that's what it is called) already has one.
Just did some research on Quintic Equation Solvers, and there's no formula like that for quadratics, cubics, and quartics. I don't think I'll create a program for quintics, since it doesn't sound like it is worth my time and effort.
Haha, nope! It's really cool that there are only formulas up to quartic.
Z80 Assembly>English>TI-BASIC>Python>French>C>0
I think it is somewhat ridiculous that if formulas for ordered polynomials of orders 2, 3, and 4 exist, then why don't 5 and higher exist? I guess it just shows that we can't know everything about Creation.
It was mathematically proven (to some surprise) by Evariste Galois using what is now known as Galois theory.
It makes sense in the way that we can find integer solutions for a+b=c, a^2+b^2=c^2, but there are no solutions for any higher powers. It's a property of numbers the way we defined them.
Z80 Assembly>English>TI-BASIC>Python>French>C>0
where is the cuberoot and squareroot commands??
Square Root is [2nd] then $x^2$
Cube Root is [2nd] then 0 then 3 then scroll to the bottom. When the arrow points to Cube Root, press enter.
Is the cube root token also found at [math][4]? I don't have my calc on me.
Z80 Assembly>English>TI-BASIC>Python>French>C>0
Ive only ever used the catalog to enter it, but yes It is math+4