| Welcome to TI-Basic Developer (TI|BD), the TI-Basic information repository! If you are a first-time visitor, please check out the welcome pack to get up to speed on using the site. We encourage you to become a member and to get involved in the community, and to come back often to see what changes have occurred. And above all else, enjoy your stay! |
     |
| Recent Forum Posts | Recent Forum Threads | Popular Forum Threads |
I just noticed that the calculator graphics on the homepage are now animated… I like it!...
(by burr 29 Sep 2016 03:40, posts: 24)
There's actually a page dedicated to program protection techniques…
(by burr 29 Sep 2016 03:34, posts: 4)
I'm familiar with TI-83 basic, but I recently acquired a TI-92 v1.11 graphing calculator, was...
(by dannash987 29 Sep 2016 00:26, posts: 1) |
(Started 29 Sep 2016 00:26,
Posts: 1)
(Started 29 Sep 2016 00:21,
Posts: 1)
(Started 28 Sep 2016 12:08,
Posts: 4)
(Started 28 Sep 2016 11:21,
Posts: 5)
(Started 27 Sep 2016 00:07,
Posts: 2)
(Started 24 Sep 2016 19:07,
Posts: 1)
|
(Started 29 May 2014 01:58 ,
Posts: 48)
(Started 28 Sep 2016 11:21 ,
Posts: 5)
(Started 28 Sep 2016 12:08 ,
Posts: 4)
(Started 23 Sep 2016 16:56 ,
Posts: 3)
(Started 17 Sep 2016 18:52 ,
Posts: 6)
(Started 24 Sep 2016 11:43 ,
Posts: 2)
|
| TI-83 Basic | 68k TI-Basic | TI-Nspire Basic |
 TI-83 Basic is the most commonly used, because the TI-83/84 series has been heavily marketed by Texas Instruments to high school students needing a graphing calculator for math and science classes. At the same time, it is the least powerful language, lacking many of the complex commands and programming capabilities. |
 68k TI-Basic is much more powerful than TI-83 Basic, with support for calculus, indirection, local variables and functions, advanced picture manipulation, and several other features that make it a very rich language. However, it isn't used nearly as much as TI-84 Basic, so it doesn't have as big of a community developed around it. |
 TI-Nspire Basic is quite similar to 68k TI-Basic, but not as programmer friendly: it has poor I/O support, rigid constraints on program execution, and documents are used instead of programs. In addition, it is still relatively unknown to the TI community, so there isn't much documentation available yet. |
